Newsletter

Greenwashing vs. Greenhushing: How to Communicate Safely About Green Progress

News

Greenwashing vs. Greenhushing: How to Communicate Safely About Green Progress

The Consumer Ombudsman has published a new set of recommendations guiding companies on using green claims about climate and the environment in a credible and lawful way. Read on, as this article covers the key points to keep you updated on the rules for environmental marketing.
Date: November 13th, 2024

“A Greener Choice,” “CO2-Saving,” and “A Sustainable Alternative.”

We’ve all encountered expressions like these in recent years—and some may have sounded a little too good to be true.

With growing attention on green transition from media, politicians, businesses, and consumers, the Consumer Ombudsman has now established a set of communication guidelines to prevent misleading marketing and inaccurate claims that erode trust in genuine green initiatives.

The Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations guide companies in communicating responsibly and accurately when making green claims about climate, environment, and sustainability in their marketing.

These new guidelines replace the previous quick guide on environmental marketing from 2021 and provide specific guidance for companies that want to highlight their green initiatives in a lawful and credible manner.

Read more: Draft for the new regulation is ready: Here are 7 important news

 

Greenwashing vs. Greenhushing

In recent years, the growing focus on sustainability and CO₂ reductions has led to numerous positive initiatives.

Unfortunately, there have also been cases where the actual impact of these efforts has been dressed up in “borrowed green feathers.” Too many empty promises and vague documentation have led to accusations of greenwashing, followed by warnings and fines.

This, in turn, has led to greenhushing, where companies choose to keep quiet about the positive effects of their sustainable initiatives that are actually true. This happens both because they are uncertain about what they can communicate and, more often, out of fear of criticism or accusations of greenwashing.

It’s a shame, as it means genuine and valuable progress often goes unnoticed, missing the positive impact it could have had on consumers and society.

Read more on this subject: Inadequate legislation can lead to distortion of competition and chaos in waste handling

 

Guidelines to Increase Transparency and Credibility

The purpose of the Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations and examples is to create greater clarity, transparency, and credibility in the marketing of green products and initiatives.

In general, you can go a long way by keeping these three key tips in mind:

1. You must always be able to document what you say
Always be specific in your marketing, and remember that all green claims must be verifiable—good intentions are not enough. Claims should reflect actual benefits of the product compared to similar products, and in most cases, documentation should be verified by an independent third party.

2. Keep claims in proportion
Use concrete and precise statements in your marketing, and avoid broad, vague terms like “green” and “eco-friendly.” There must be a reasonable correlation between the actual, measurable progress—such as CO₂ reduction or sustainable transformation—and the messages in your communication. For example, it doesn’t make sense to highlight “greener packaging” if the packaging accounts for only one percent of the product’s overall CO₂ footprint.

3. Avoid empty promises—be as concrete as possible
Be cautious with abstract terms and vague slogans. The Consumer Ombudsman has previously warned against calling products “sustainable” without real evidence to support it. Other vague terms like “regenerative” have also been flagged. Avoid such terms unless they are clearly explained and documented. It has also become nearly impossible to market products as “net zero” or “climate neutral” if this is based solely on carbon offsetting. Avoid exaggerations, and never use general or vague statements without explaining precisely what they mean in practice.

 

Specification of Additional Areas

The Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations also include clarifications on several areas:

 

Clarification of Responsibility

The new recommendations place greater emphasis on ensuring accountability and consideration throughout the entire supply chain.

As a general rule, the company that markets a product is responsible for complying with the marketing laws and may face penalties for violations.

However, the new recommendations clarify the relationship between the manufacturer and the retailer, emphasizing that the retailer can also be held responsible if they remain passive. The retailer is obligated to ensure that the manufacturer’s marketing is accurate before it is passed on.

Although a retailer can typically rely on the manufacturer’s information, they must investigate further if the information seems questionable or if there are particular circumstances that warrant additional scrutiny. A retailer can, therefore, be held responsible even for simple negligence.

The updated recommendations also include a separate section detailing the responsibility for complying with the marketing laws, clearly outlining the responsibilities of manufacturers, retailers, influencers, and online platforms.

If your company uses influencers in its marketing, you should be aware that influencers can be held responsible for promoting products with environmental claims without supporting documentation. If the influencer receives vague, general information about a product’s sustainability, they should request documentation or further details from the company. Additionally, online platforms selling third-party products can be held responsible for illegal information on their platform, even if they were not directly aware of it.

When it comes to responsibility for marketing a product, both the manufacturer and the retailer can be held accountable, especially if an environmental claim is attached to the product. If the retailer is not the manufacturer, the Consumer Ombudsman will generally treat the case against the manufacturer unless the retailer has acted negligently.

 

Sustainability

The Consumer Ombudsman emphasizes in the new recommendations that it is difficult to label a product as “sustainable” without risking misleading consumers. Therefore, it is recommended that companies avoid using sustainability claims in their marketing. However, this does not mean that you cannot use the term “sustainable” in your communication at all.

You can highlight that you are “striving for sustainability” or “implementing sustainability initiatives.” It is important to note, however, that compliance with specific sustainability regulations (e.g., due to special legislation) does not automatically entitle a company to market a product as “sustainable.”

Your company can also legally describe its sustainability efforts under a specific section on its website, such as a “Sustainability” tab. This section should include information about your efforts to promote sustainability or the specific sustainability initiatives your company has implemented.

Therefore, companies can market themselves as working on sustainability, but this requires that the initiatives genuinely result in significant improvements. These initiatives may include actions that substantially contribute to, for example, biodiversity, climate, pollution, recycling, reuse, or material choices that significantly reduce the strain on the Earth’s resources.

 

Recycled vs. Reused

The new recommendations place an emphasis on using specific terms to support your communication about sustainability. As part of this, the use of the terms “recycled” and “reused” is clarified.

It is crucial for companies to understand the difference between these concepts.

  • Recycled
    A product is considered “recycled” when it has been processed and used as material in the production of a new product. This means that the original product has gone through a process where it has been collected, treated, and transformed into a new product or material that can be reused, rather than extracting raw materials from virgin resources.
  • Reused
    A product is considered “reused” when it continues to be used in the same way it was originally designed for, without undergoing a substantial processing or transformation process. For example, a reused bag might be an old bag that is cleaned and used again for the same purpose, while a bottle that is washed and refilled is also considered reused.

The Consumer Ombudsman clarifies that a bottle that is cleaned and refilled can be termed “reused,” while a bottle that is melted down and used in the production of a new product is considered “recycled.”

This distinction is important because a bottle made from recycled plastic has a higher environmental impact than one made from reused plastic. Misuse of these terms can lead to the marketing being considered misleading.

Additionally, it is specified that a product can only be marketed as “recycled” if at least 95% of the product is made from recycled materials.

 

Other Topics:

The Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations also cover topics such as:

  • Own labeling schemes
  • Changes in requirements for general climate or environmental claims
  • Carbon offsetting
  • Specific regulations on sustainability
  • And much more

Read the full recommendations from the Consumer Ombudsman here (in Danish).

Get Your Communication Evaluated

The Consumer Ombudsman’s recommendations also include the opportunity to get assistance in evaluating your marketing efforts in advance.

The Consumer Ombudsman can assess whether your initiative will be within the legal framework or not.

According to the recommendation, the Consumer Ombudsman will strive to handle such inquiries within 6 weeks once the case is fully disclosed.

New – and Important – Additions to the Marketing Act

The Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations also include several relevant details about the changes to the UCP Directive, which will come into effect on September 27, 2026.

The UCP Directive stands for the Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices and is an EU directive. The directive sets rules for how businesses should behave in relation to consumers and regulates commercial practices and marketing methods that can be deemed unfair, misleading, or aggressive.

The UCP Directive covers, among other things:

  • Misleading commercial practices: For example, giving false or misleading information about a product or service that could influence a consumer’s decision to purchase.
  • Aggressive commercial practices: Marketing techniques that exploit consumer vulnerability, coerce, or pressure them into making decisions they otherwise wouldn’t have made.
  • Requirement for clear and transparent information: Consumers must have access to correct and understandable information before making a purchasing decision.

The UCP Directive is part of the EU’s consumer protection legislation and aims to create a fair market where consumers are not misled or subjected to unfair treatment by businesses.

In Denmark, the directive is being implemented in the Marketing Act, which sets the rules for how marketing must be conducted to avoid unfair commercial practices.

On February 28, 2024, the UCP Directive was revised, and the new rules will be incorporated into the Marketing Act through various additions.

With the upcoming changes, which will come into force in 2026, the requirements for documentation and transparency will be tightened, especially for companies that market environmental and sustainability-related claims.

Why It’s Important for Your Business

Responsible behavior is no longer just a virtue. It is a necessity for businesses that want success both now and in the future.

Politicians demand it, and consumers, partners, and employees expect it. Central to this development is the way we communicate about the progress being made, the challenges we face, and the problems we still need to address.

Precise, transparent, and accurate information about your initiatives will become crucial, and the Consumer Ombudsman’s new recommendations can serve as a tool to help your business navigate the current requirements and ensure compliance with the Marketing Act.